Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 09:49:01

Douglas Gregor wrote:

> Obviously, this is not the case. Looking at the summary page, however,
> we get a view across many CVS states, so it's hard to tell which version
> of the source code we're looking at. The answer isn't to submit only
> once per day (more testing is better, always!), but to have at least one
> build from each tester that references the source code at 12:00am EST.
> When a tester is capable of submitting more builds in a day, we have the
> most up-to-date build AND the 12:00am EST build in the results, which
> will make it very easy to see what's we've broken in a given day.

Would keeping a history of previous builds that are marked with the
state of CVS they tested solve the problem?

If yes.. That's what BuildBot does.

[[ follow ups to boost-testing ]]

-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. -
-- rrivera/ - grafik/ - 102708583/icq

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at