From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 09:48:15
Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams writes:
>> Misha Bergal <mbergal_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>> I'm wondering whether companies that are both hardware vendors and
>>>> compiler vendors would be willing to support testing of Boost by
>>>> donating resources (hardware and compilers). However, legal issues
>>>> would have to get examined closely. We can't make promises like "the
>>>> next Boost version will support this compiler or that operating
>>> Needs to be worked at.
>> I think we can get both resources from OSL.
> Meaning hardware resources
> _and_ group access to commercial compilers?
In some form, I think. I'm not sure we would all be able to log in
and run a commercial compiler, but if OSL had a BuildBot slave running
these compilers, we wouldn't have to. A scheme something like this
doesn't neccessarily depend on the use of BuildBot either.
[followups to boost-testing]
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk