Re: [boost] Re: offline code generator for BIL

From: christopher diggins (cdiggins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 10:54:44

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]>
> I think I've developed an adaquate specification; I'm in the process of
> modifying the current implementatin so that it satisfies the 
> specification.

Great, I am really looking forward to it.

I just wanted to go on the record as saying I am now just as happy with 
hand-written interfaces as machine written, at least for the forseeable 
future.

> Jonathan
>
> p.s. BIL is no longer an acronym, it's an ordinary word -- just like OLE 
> was for
> a while. Or,  maybe I should say it stands for "BIL Isn't Legit (yet)"

In light of recent (valid) concerns brought up by David, I would like to 
have the next version of the BIL outside of the Boost namespace and not in a 
folder named Boost. I hope this isn't too much to ask? This might in fact be 
a good practice for all new proposed and experimental libraries.

Christopher Diggins
Object Oriented Template Library (OOTL)
http://www.ootl.org