From: christopher diggins (cdiggins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 10:54:44
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]>
> I think I've developed an adaquate specification; I'm in the process of
> modifying the current implementatin so that it satisfies the
Great, I am really looking forward to it.
I just wanted to go on the record as saying I am now just as happy with
hand-written interfaces as machine written, at least for the forseeable
> p.s. BIL is no longer an acronym, it's an ordinary word -- just like OLE
> was for
> a while. Or, maybe I should say it stands for "BIL Isn't Legit (yet)"
In light of recent (valid) concerns brought up by David, I would like to
have the next version of the BIL outside of the Boost namespace and not in a
folder named Boost. I hope this isn't too much to ask? This might in fact be
a good practice for all new proposed and experimental libraries.
Object Oriented Template Library (OOTL)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk