Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 10:41:12

Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> Daniel James ha escrito:
>>I'm not happy with this either.
> Why not? Sure it has the overhead of checking validity against
> every new stdlib that comes around, but you've already commited
> to this kind of activity with the workarounds on float_functions.hpp
> Besides, the amount of work needed to accommodate a new
> library is 0 in most cases and negligible in the rare cases where
> extra template parms are used.

Sorry, I meant: 'I'm not happy with the current situation either'.

I suppose if there are any real problems with providing our own
declarations then someone will point them out soon. Anyone?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at