Re: [boost] Re: [review] hash functions

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 13:57:38

Daniel James wrote:
> Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
>
>>    It may be considered whether support for
>>    shared_ptr etc could be added.
>
> I'm not sure what the semantics would be for shared_ptr, I think if it
> was based on the pointer this could suprise some people.

I'll add a hash_value overload for shared_ptr and weak_ptr if/when the 
library is accepted. In general, it should be the responsibility of the 
class author to provide the appropriate hash_value overload.