From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 13:55:49
Fabio Fracassi wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Here are my remarks about some of the logo candidates.
>> C) the letters "C++" and the scope resolution operator "::" simply
>> aren't very visually appealing.
> I don't think so. For one, (not that this counts ;) ) my favorites
> are the logos 20
Hmmm... that's one of mine ;-) I guess I overstated my case :-)
> 43 and 39 (38 not so much)
> All of them could improve a bit, e.g. #20 should be recolored, take a
> real blue instead of the "baby blue" , strong bordeaux red instead of
> "dirty pink" and have a bit more contrast in the white parts.
These color changes are easy, of course. I think the blue looks okay; I see what
you mean about the red.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk