[boost] Re: Re: Re: FSM Review

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 17:10:44

"Andreas Huber" wrote:

> 2. At runtime. Each TU could have one static variable of a type with a 
> constructor. Inside the ctor you register your part of the FSM with the 
> FSM object. This sounds like it could work. Problem is that the standard 
> does not give many guarantees when exactly these static objects are 
> constructed. You can *hope* that they are constructed before the FSM 
> object and on some platforms they actually are constructed at program 
> startup but there's no guarantee for that.
Just note: Singleton library (the one written by Jason Hise)
allows guaranteed construction order for objects in multiple TUs.

/Pavel