Re: [boost] Re: [review] hash functions

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-10 06:22:10

Daniel James wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>
>> Do not give much weight to the opinion of the committee, either. The
>> resolution of the hash<string> issue follows the path of the least
>> resistance.
>
> A typical comittee then?

Not really. You have to keep in mind the context: the TR is being finalized, 
this is not the time or place to introduce major changes. The idea is that 
the TR is a work in progress and is still open for improvement before it 
becomes part of the official standard.