From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-10 06:22:10
Daniel James wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> Do not give much weight to the opinion of the committee, either. The
>> resolution of the hash<string> issue follows the path of the least
> A typical comittee then?
Not really. You have to keep in mind the context: the TR is being finalized,
this is not the time or place to introduce major changes. The idea is that
the TR is a work in progress and is still open for improvement before it
becomes part of the official standard.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk