From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-10 04:35:00
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Do not give much weight to the opinion of the committee, either. The
> resolution of the hash<string> issue follows the path of the least
A typical comittee then?
> Nobody uses nonstandard character traits. They are fundamentally broken
> for a variety of reasons. Their only purpose is to generate discussions
> such as this one. ;-)
> But if this will make you feel better, define the overload as taking
> basic_string<Ch, char_traits<Ch>, A>. Nobody will spot the difference.
Oh, people on this list will. ;)
You're probably right, and I'm sure it wouldn't be long before someone
asked for support for that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk