From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-15 13:41:12
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> P.S. BTW, does it says anywhere that primary template is required to
> be ill-format for array types? Could STL implementers does a better
It is implied by the signature of numeric_limits<T>::max:
template<class T> class numeric_limits
static T max() throw();
When T is an array type, this declaration is ill-formed. I'm not sure
whether STL implementers are allowed to let a program that uses
numeric_limits<X[N]> compile anyway, but they are certainly not required to.
This probably applies to abstract classes as well.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk