Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-15 18:08:44

Next message: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Previous message: Andreas Huber: "[boost] Re: [FSM library] review result: accepted with few conditions"
In reply to: SourceForge.net: "[boost] [Boost-bugs] [ boost-Bugs-1164057 ] boost::filesystem::exists has bugs with UNC paths"
Next in thread: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Reply: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Reply: Suman Cherukuri: "[boost] filesystem compile problem on Redhar"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Reply: Michael Glassford: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"

SourceForge.net wrote:
> Bugs item #1164057, was opened at 2005-03-15 14:02

[...]

Our bug database is in a really sorry state. It was in a similarly sorry
state the last time I looked at it. I'll try to assign and sort some of the
unassigned bugs.

I notice that some developers do respond to the bug reports via comments,
but do not update the resolution and do not close the bug. If you want bug
admin rights, please ask.

We have a number of open tokenizer/pool/threads/any/lexical_cast/rational
bugs. What should we do with them?

Next message: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Previous message: Andreas Huber: "[boost] Re: [FSM library] review result: accepted with few conditions"
In reply to: SourceForge.net: "[boost] [Boost-bugs] [ boost-Bugs-1164057 ] boost::filesystem::exists has bugs with UNC paths"
Next in thread: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Reply: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Reply: Suman Cherukuri: "[boost] filesystem compile problem on Redhar"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"
Reply: Michael Glassford: "[boost] Re: SF bug database"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk