[boost] Re: FSM review

From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-21 19:16:38

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> All I wanted is a succint description of the various known
>> approaches to implementing FSMs -- including existing frameworks and
>> stuff you tried in the early stages of developing your framework --
>> together with an explanation of the performance tradeoffs.
>
> That does seem like a reasonable request.  Rationales and comparisons
> with alternate designs are very important in Boost documentation.

FWIW, I also think such a request is reasonable. I questioned the 
expectations Jonathan seems to have regarding such documentation.

Regards,

-- 
Andreas Huber
When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap
from the address shown in the header.