From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-24 05:53:17
"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
| > We are already protecting classes by a namespace, shouldn't that be
| No, because we're using unqualified calls to turn on ADL.
begin() is protected by a namespace, the hook is protected by
a library name. It was because begin() was likely to clash that we
need another ungly sounding hook.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk