From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-24 21:40:25
Thomas Witt wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>> "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> its irritating especially for boost authors because it dosn't wok
>> portable; putting the code into boost::begin()
>> solves that once and for all.
> If all we are concerned about are boost authors, I don't think this is
> not the correct solution. Neither is it won't work portable an argument
> to me. Portability issues should not drive such a fundamental point of
> library interface design.
I'll try this again:
If all we are concerned about are boost authors, I am not convinced this
is the correct solution. Neither is "it won't work portable" an argument
to me. I think portability issues should not drive such a fundamental
point of library interface design.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk