From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-25 00:28:56
Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>> "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> its irritating especially for boost authors because it dosn't wok
>>> portable; putting the code into boost::begin()
>>> solves that once and for all.
>> If all we are concerned about are boost authors, I don't think this
>> is not the correct solution. Neither is it won't work portable an
>> argument to me. Portability issues should not drive such a
>> fundamental point of library interface design.
> I'll try this again:
> If all we are concerned about are boost authors, I am not convinced
I've lost the thread. What is "this"?
> is the correct solution. Neither is "it won't work portable" an
> argument to me. I think portability issues should not drive such a
> fundamental point of library interface design.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk