Re: [boost] Re: Re: Classpath to C++ conversion

From: Kon Lovett (klovett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-01 11:43:00

Take a look at  http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc, a 
conservative gc for c/c++. W/ the gc & translated classpath you almost 
won't know your using c++.

Kon

On Mar 31, 2005, at 10:45 PM, Tushar wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 19:36, Kon Lovett wrote:
>> Uh, then maybe automated translation. (Only know of one translator:
>> http://www.remotesoft.com/octopus but it is commercial & .NET
>> oriented.)
>>
>> Any Java core class libraries w/o license issues?
> Thanks for pointer. I liked it. I also want to do something similar.
> Only problem I have with java is GC. That is where major changes will 
> be
> required. Classpath is GNU implementation of java. They use same API 
> but
> with their own implementation, so I think one can use source to make a
> lib. It need to be under GPL.
>>
>> Kon
>>
>> On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:42 AM, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Tushar" wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>> For now, forget about classpath and gcj. These are implementation
>>>> issues. This is all about having a java api implemented in C++. I 
>>>> want
>>>> to know how much people thinks this can be good thing to do.
>>>>
>>> A system that would allow to reuse Java sources without
>>> much of pain would be Good Thing (TM).
>>>
>>> /Pavel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>