Re: [boost] Re: Re: Classpath to C++ conversion

From: Tushar (tushar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-01 01:45:26

On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 19:36, Kon Lovett wrote:
> Uh, then maybe automated translation. (Only know of one translator: 
> http://www.remotesoft.com/octopus but it is commercial & .NET 
> oriented.)
> 
> Any Java core class libraries w/o license issues?
Thanks for pointer. I liked it. I also want to do something similar.
Only problem I have with java is GC. That is where major changes will be
required. Classpath is GNU implementation of java. They use same API but
with their own implementation, so I think one can use source to make a
lib. It need to be under GPL.
> 
> Kon
> 
> On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:42 AM, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
> 
> >
> > "Tushar" wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> For now, forget about classpath and gcj. These are implementation
> >> issues. This is all about having a java api implemented in C++. I want
> >> to know how much people thinks this can be good thing to do.
> >>
> > A system that would allow to reuse Java sources without
> > much of pain would be Good Thing (TM).
> >
> > /Pavel
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>