From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-02 07:57:14
Daniel James wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> * boost::hash derived from std::unary_function
>> This introduces a completely unnecessary dependency on <functional>.
>> boost::hash only needs to define result_type and argument_type.
> I thought this was required by TR1. I'll happily remove it if isn't.
It's required; I just don't agree with the requirement, it's overly strict.
I prefer to view the standard wording as a shorthand notation for the
typedefs. User code should never depend on the inheritance relationship
between a function object and std::*nary_function... and neither should our
(There are other defects in TR1 along the same lines, but it's far too late
now to fix them.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk