From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-02 10:30:39
> It was my proposal to put it under <boost/functional/hash.hpp>,
> on the following rationales:
> * TR1 hash is located on <functional>
> * When John Maddock's Boost.TR1 inititative includes Boost.Hash,
> the naming conventions set up by John suggest that the
> wrapping header will be <boost/tr1/functional>, which is
> more consistent with <boost/functional/hash.hpp> than with
> <boost/hash.hpp> (IMHO).
I'm not sure that the two have to coincide to that degree, and anyway there
is no TR1 Boost lib yet (but watch this space). As long as the hash
functions are somewhere sensible it seems fair enough as it is (I've no
strong feelings any which way though).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk