Re: [boost] Re: [1.33.0] Release schedule suggestion

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-02 20:38:58

At Saturday 2005-04-02 16:57, you wrote:
>"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > At Saturday 2005-04-02 11:10, you wrote:
> >> > I'll agree again. The changes I check in when we are in release
> >> > mode (have a release branch active) _always_ go to both the trunk
> >> > and the branch. The branch doesn't help me in any way.
> >> >
> >> > Apr 15: feature freeze
> >> > Release "when it's done"
> >>
> >>If "when it's done" is short enough, e.g. 2-3 weeks, then it's not
> >>even worth branching.  Better to just concentrate on getting kinks
> >>out for the release.  Is this at all realistic?
> >
> > the reason for the branch is to that those developers who need to work on
> > stuff NOT related to the release have someplace to put their "commits".
>
>In that case you and Doug have different things in mind.

I didn't see anything that Doug said that disagrees.
he hasn't said anything about people working on stuff other than the release

>
>I predict this whole thing is going to cause lots of confusion and
>chaos unless people get it very clear (quickly) what's happening and
>make sure it's well advertised.
>
>--
>Dave Abrahams
>Boost Consulting
>www.boost-consulting.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"