From: Joe Gottman (jgottman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-03 11:34:54
Several weeks ago I reported that boost::optional<T> was not safe under
self-assignment. The author of the class said he was fixing the library,
but no new versions of the code have been checked into the CVS repository.
With the code freeze for boost 1.33 only a couple of weeks away, I was
wondering whether optional<T> would be fixed on time.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk