From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-04 11:53:49
"Joe Gottman" <jgottman_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> Several weeks ago I reported that boost::optional<T> was not safe under
> self-assignment. The author of the class said he was fixing the library,
> but no new versions of the code have been checked into the CVS repository.
> With the code freeze for boost 1.33 only a couple of weeks away, I was
> wondering whether optional<T> would be fixed on time.
I haven't commited the fixes yet.
The reason is that I found an issue with references and I couldn't make up
my mind about how to fix it.
See this thread:
I will reach a dicision soon enough though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk