Date: 2005-04-06 13:44:11
> In order
> to try and get this process out of the mud I propose we hold a new vote,
> with the following conditions (these are simply suggestions for guidelines
> this so that we have something to work with, I don't care if it is
> or not):
> 8) ballots are made in the form readable by Jason Hise's computer program
In the previous vote, there was a restriction of five votes per person.
My program would be capable of handling any number of votes per person
(which could vary from one person to the next), and I don't think that
having the number of votes vary would adversely affect the outcome (only
the top choice that hasn't already been removed is counted). Does it make
sense to drop the five votes requirement, and allow people to rank however
many entries they choose?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk