|
Boost : |
From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-11 20:07:32
Rene Rivera wrote:
[...]
> Which when applied to the other functions, compiles without warnings.
> And since all the tests pass, I checked in the changes to CVS.
Also, I forgot to ask about something I noticed.. In sp_counted_base.hpp
there is this sequence:
#elif defined( __GNUC__ ) && ( defined( __i386__ ) || defined(
__x86_64__ ) )
# include <boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp>
...and further along...
#elif defined( WIN32 ) || defined( _WIN32 ) || defined( __WIN32__ )
# include <boost/detail/sp_counted_base_w32.hpp>
Question is.. Shouldn't we be using the Win32 implementation in the case
of GCC on Windows, i.e. under MinGW?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk