Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-11 20:07:32


Rene Rivera wrote:
[...]
> Which when applied to the other functions, compiles without warnings.
> And since all the tests pass, I checked in the changes to CVS.

Also, I forgot to ask about something I noticed.. In sp_counted_base.hpp
there is this sequence:

     #elif defined( __GNUC__ ) && ( defined( __i386__ ) || defined(
__x86_64__ ) )
     # include <boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp>

...and further along...

     #elif defined( WIN32 ) || defined( _WIN32 ) || defined( __WIN32__ )
     # include <boost/detail/sp_counted_base_w32.hpp>

Question is.. Shouldn't we be using the Win32 implementation in the case
of GCC on Windows, i.e. under MinGW?

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk