[boost] Re: [shared_ptr] possible bug in sp_counted_base.hpp

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-13 11:40:23

Rene Rivera wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
> 
>> No, because the Win32 implementation on non-MSVC/Intel makes indirect 
>> calls to the kernel Interlocked* functions. The g++ version is better.
> 
> 
> So that brings up this question..
> 
> Would it be preferable to have CodeWarrior on Windows use an assembly 
> implementation? That is have a sp_counted_base_cw_x86.hpp, with the same 
> implementation as sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp.

(ping) Haven't gotten an answer on the question.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org