From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-13 11:40:23
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> No, because the Win32 implementation on non-MSVC/Intel makes indirect
>> calls to the kernel Interlocked* functions. The g++ version is better.
> So that brings up this question..
> Would it be preferable to have CodeWarrior on Windows use an assembly
> implementation? That is have a sp_counted_base_cw_x86.hpp, with the same
> implementation as sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp.
(ping) Haven't gotten an answer on the question.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk