From: Don G (dongryphon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-13 20:53:35
--- Caleb Epstein wrote:
> On 4/13/05, Don G <dongryphon_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I also believe that non-blocking is an I/O only thing; it is not
>> needed for connect or accept.
> Not sure about the need for a non-blocking accept, but a
> non-blocking connect is a must-have.
What do you mean by non-blocking exactly? Based on the proposal I
posted, async connect seems about the same as non-blocking: call me
when I can connect... oh, wait, I am connected :). Maybe I'm missing
something in the definitions?
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk