Re: [boost] Re: [shared_ptr] possible bug in sp_counted_base.hpp

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-14 04:47:26

Rene Rivera wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>
>>> Yes, I know, I'm being a pest about this.. But I'm *really*
>>> interested in the CW/x86 case.
>>
>> Well, if our review manager and our testers don't mind, you can go
>> ahead and add a _cw_x86 version. Although it might be a good idea to
>> verify whether it actually leads to an increase in performance
>> first. ;-)
>
> OK, I tried translating the gcc_x86. But I just don't understand the
> GCC machine description language well enough. What does the assembly
> end up being for all those memory, cc, etc. ?

I don't think that CodeWarrior has any way of specifying whether an asm 
statement affects memory, clobbers a register, or should not be reordered. 
It's supposedly (and hopefully) smart enough to figure these things out on 
its own. ;-)