From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-14 06:05:41
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> | > I'm saying the decision to overload hash_value for arrays seems a bit
> | > arbitrary.
> | We overload hash_value for every standard container. Array support doesn't
> | seem very arbitrary.
> | You seem a bit obsessed with ranges. ;-)
> yeah, I know :-)
The need to get a hash value for an array shouldn't create a
dependency on the range library.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk