From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-20 03:17:31
At Tuesday 2005-04-19 16:50, you wrote:
>>P.S. It still costs us all money to try to support
>Oh and at no point did I say that I think boost should support vc6,
>regardless of that fact that it costs users (or us testers) nothing to
>support it except maybe a few more seconds to parse a couple of #def's or
>download a fraction more code. It costs the implementers time and that is
>there own personal choice at the end of the day; not yours, mine or anyone
we went through this once before. It costs the testers and it's not just a
few seconds (or maybe you don't look at your results to see if something
YOU have done screwed up).
Thank you for your help in doing the regression tests, by the way. But
you're dreaming if you think that some developer screwing up something in
his/her zeal to support vc6 costs nobody else.
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk