[boost] Re: como toolset failures

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-23 11:59:45

Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> I think that big part of failures in como toolset are due to --a (strict 
> mode) option. This unfortunatelly prevents windows headers from being 
> included. Or more precisely, the exact reasult of including windows 
> headers with --a option on is that compiler chokes on __declspec, which 
> is exactly what I see in results. I'd rather not update como toolset to 
> remove this option, maybe someone more familiar with bjam will do this.

Is this specific files?

I ask because there's already a facility in the como-win32 toolset for 
removing the --a option by specifying that certain files with 
<no-warn>file.cpp

Or is this a global problem?

As in the flag should be removed entirely. And here I ask because I 
though part of the idea of testing with como, once upon a time, was to 
have that strict mode testing.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org