From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 00:18:15
"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "Thorsten Ottosen" wrote:
>> Besides, boost.date_time I think these other libs are good candidates
>> with slight modifications):
>> 2. optional
> This would be very useful addition.
> It would likely require update of algorithms, e.g. std::sort
> to deal with containers of optionals.
I disagree. That's what custom comparison operators are for.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk