From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-23 21:46:07
"Thorsten Ottosen" wrote:
> Besides, boost.date_time I think these other libs are good candidates
> with slight modifications):
> 2. optional
This would be very useful addition.
It would likely require update of algorithms, e.g. std::sort
to deal with containers of optionals.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk