Boost logo

Boost :

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-23 21:46:07

"Thorsten Ottosen" wrote:

> Besides, boost.date_time I think these other libs are good candidates
> (maybe
> with slight modifications):
> 2. optional
This would be very useful addition.

It would likely require update of algorithms, e.g. std::sort
to deal with containers of optionals.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at