From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 07:18:25
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Good idea. Who is responsible for this code?
> A while ago I promised a patch that would:
> 1) Shift the code into boost/type_traits,
> 2) Make it TR1 conforming.
> 3) Apply patches to existing clients of aligned_storage.
> I haven't got around to (3) yet, but there's a good chance I'll do it early
> next week.
I don't understand what 3 might entail. Are these fixes to
aligned_storage already done, and how can they possibly cause clients
to require being patched?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk