[boost] Re: aligned_storage not a POD?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 07:18:25

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Good idea.  Who is responsible for this code?
>
> A while ago I promised a patch that would:
>
> 1) Shift the code into boost/type_traits,
> 2) Make it TR1 conforming.
> 3) Apply patches to existing clients of aligned_storage.
>
> I haven't got around to (3) yet, but there's a good chance I'll do it early 
> next week.

I don't understand what 3 might entail.  Are these fixes to
aligned_storage already done, and how can they possibly cause clients
to require being patched?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com