From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 08:06:02
David Abrahams wrote:
> "John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> Good idea. Who is responsible for this code?
>> A while ago I promised a patch that would:
>> 1) Shift the code into boost/type_traits,
>> 2) Make it TR1 conforming.
>> 3) Apply patches to existing clients of aligned_storage.
>> I haven't got around to (3) yet, but there's a good chance I'll do
>> it early next week.
> I don't understand what 3 might entail. Are these fixes to
> aligned_storage already done, and how can they possibly cause clients
> to require being patched?
I think that it would be easier to just define a proper ::type in
aligned_storage (data_t, the type of its data_ member, should do). The test
needs to be fixed first, of course.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk