From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 11:43:31
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 23:32:22 +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote
| > 5. variant
| Is variant used widely enough to spend the time to standardize?
| > 6. iostreams
| Agree on this too.
| Should we be considering some of the new collection types: circular_buffer,
| mutli_array, multi_index, ptr_containers?
I asked abuot ptr_containers and the answer was "not yet".
| Or are the uses too esoteric for
probably. I wouldn't write any proposal before hearing what the committee
In Lillehammer we rejected a policy-based smart pointer and it should never
that far; I mean, David H. spent a lot of time writing the proposal and that
time could have been
| What about serialization -- it's a big library, but really
people are working on a proposal about reflection for C++0x which would give
automatic serialization; so we'd better wait with this.
| --> number types (unlimited / fixed point)
unlimited types where also rejected on the grouns it serves too few people
compared to how hard it is to implement.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk