From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 11:48:45
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > David Abrahams wrote:
| >> I'm also concerned that none of the practicable dates mentioned above
| >> will make the EWG's cutoff date for C++0x, and I'm not sure we can
| >> afford to release another standard without threading support.
| > You should probably mention what the EWG cutoff date is. :-)
| I would if I remembered for sure. I think it's something like, no new
| proposals considered after the next meeting.
| > As for the "afford to release"... There's always the safe choice of
| > <cpthread> + specifying that cancellation is a C++ exception. C++ification
| > can then be done in a TR.
| That's a possibility, but it doesn't necessarily align with some
| strong convictions from experienced concurrent programmers on the
As I said earlier, Lawrence Crowl is heading a groups looking at a threads
library for C++0x.
Most importantly, I believe Kevlin Henney will get a chance to submit his
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk