From: Don G (dongryphon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 17:25:34
> Even if we go for a interface/inheritance based
> approach is would like to expose tcp_stream/
> tcp_connector/tcp_acceptor/udp_stream et al and
> the like so the user could instantiate a concrete
> implementation and not going through the address,
> dynamic factory thingy. There might be specifics
> in these classes that you care for if you only
> support tcp eg.
Do you have any specifics in mind? If they are general in nature,
they really belong in the interface. Many things can be optionally
meaningful even if they are not universal (eg: flush).
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk