From: Michel André (michel.andre_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-25 04:06:33
Don G wrote:
> Do you have any specifics in mind? If they are general in nature,
> they really belong in the interface. Many things can be optionally
> meaningful even if they are not universal (eg: flush).
Eg nagling and linger that are typical tcp options not widely applicable
in any sense as I can see it right now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk