From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-25 10:31:02
"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
Thorsten Ottosen writes:
> "Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> | if we're going to consider updating any of the algorithms, why can't we
> | somehow update them all so that somealg(c.begin(), c.end(),
> | means exactly the same thing as:
> | somealg(c, morepossibleargs)
> | ?
> Don't worry; I'll propose this as part óf my submission of
Please be sure to coordinate with other people who worked/are working
on the topic, then. See
instance. This is way too important to allow a false start, IMO.
Well, I'm not proposing new iterator concepts, although David and Dietmar
That said, Ranges pretty much follow whatever iterator categories that exists.
I won't have time to look into this stuff for some time. If you feel its
important, go do the work.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk