[boost] Re: TR2 and C++0x heads up

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-25 10:31:02

"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:m1d5sjfh5l.fsf_at_tulip.office.meta...
Thorsten Ottosen writes:
> "Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> wrote in message

> | if we're going to consider updating any of the algorithms, why can't we
> | somehow update them all so that somealg(c.begin(), c.end(),
> morepossibleargs)
> | means exactly the same thing as:
> | somealg(c, morepossibleargs)
> | ?
>
> Don't worry; I'll propose this as part óf my submission of
> boost.range.

Please be sure to coordinate with other people who worked/are working
on the topic, then. See
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/120408/, for
instance. This is way too important to allow a false start, IMO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>

Well, I'm not proposing new iterator concepts, although David and Dietmar 
might be.

That said, Ranges pretty much follow whatever iterator categories that exists.

I won't have time to look into this stuff for some time. If you feel its 
important, go do the work.

-Thorsten