From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 10:07:41
Daniel James <daniel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> There isn't much point testing with Comeau otherwise; the idea is to
>> use its strictness to find bugs that other compilers miss.
> Would intel in strict mode serve the same purpose?
Not on Windows; they keep lots of non-conformances enabled for MS
compatibility purposes, even in strict mode AFAIK. It's a bit of a
mess and it's difficult to tell what you're actually getting when you
start to enable the /Qwhatever switches.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk