From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 10:37:14
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> By PBSP, do you mean policy-based smart pointers in general, or a
>> Loki-derived smart pointer in particular?
> You may say in general or Loki-derived - depend on point of view. I
> have many objections to Loki solution (and some of it's derivatives).
> But what I have in mind is similar. Do you have any other alternative
If you ask me for my personal opinion: I have little use for the Conversion
and the Checking policies. However I do need an easier way of specifying a
deleter (ala Howard's unique_ptr) and a ConstPropagation policy (with the
default being No for shallow copy and Yes for deep copy).
In addition, I'm not happy with the integration of shared/weak/intrusive_ptr
in the current model. To be really flexible, a policy-based incarnation of a
reference counted pointer needs to leave its aspects configurable, covering
the whole spectrum from a simple counted_ptr to full-featured shared_ptr
(with or without weak_ptr support in both cases) and possibly covering the
unsafe/basic/strong thread safety axis as well. This might imply a policy
controlling whether conversions from smart_ptr<T> to smart_ptr<U> are
allowed (because disallowing these allows alternative implementations or
omitting one pointer from the control block.)
My needs may not be typical, of course.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk