From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 11:34:47
Joel <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> John Maddock wrote:
>>>> I'm afraid they are on the HEAD branch..
>> Oh, shucks.
>>>> Which is why Stefan asked. Perhaps it was an unintentional commit?
>>> I was just following procedure here:
>>> It's not clear what one should do if something needs to be placed in
>>> the website but not intended to be released. Ultimately, I can simply
>>> remove it from the RC branch whenever we get to it, so I do not see
>>> why there's a big fuss. If it's the size of the CVS update you are
>>> concerned with, then probably the right thing to do is to clarify the
>>> procedure for making updates to the boost website content. Again, I
>>> am just following procedure.
>> I see what you mean, I guess this was a special case when the rules
>> should have been broken :-)
> Sorry. I'm not good at breaking the rules.
Just to be clear, the procedure isn't a set of rules, it's just a
procedure. That is, it has no legal weight; it's just a prescription
that's only optimal for the common case.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk