From: Russell Hind (rh_gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-27 06:38:51
Neal Becker wrote:
> Doesn't seem very boost-ish. I don't think everything that would be a
> useful c++ library belongs in boost.
Why not? It would provide a common interface to common os functions
such as thread does.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk