From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-27 13:27:54
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> It appears that aligned storage itself is not a POD, so the ::type
>> is necessary.
I can't imagine what would necessitate making aligned_storage<T> not a
POD. Can somebody please explain?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk