From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-28 04:54:15
>>> It appears that aligned storage itself is not a POD, so the ::type
>>> is necessary.
> I can't imagine what would necessitate making aligned_storage<T> not a
> POD. Can somebody please explain?
It has user defined constructors (to make it non-copyable), and private
data. I don't know why it was done that way, I'm just trying to make sure
that the ::type member is TR1 conforming.
BTW using aligned_storage directly like that (not going through the ::type
member), is and always has been, untested and undocumented.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk