From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-30 13:50:30
"Thorsten Ottosen" wrote...
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote...
> | I believe we should move this discussion into separate thread.
> | FOREACH is under review now and range_ex is not even requested yet.
> | If we want it to be reviewed the first step in this direction could
> | be to request one.
> Then I request a review :-)
> Eric, please just respond privately or in a new thread.
I don't believe it's ready for that. You may feel you know the answers
to those design questions, but I'm less confident, and I would like more
Besides, Dave A. has been working in this space, and if a unified
approach to range algorithms can be found, that would be preferable. If
no such unified approach can be found, I want to know that it has at
least been explored.
If you would like to drive the development of range_ex, be my guest.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk