From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-01 16:08:02
"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| "Thorsten Ottosen" wrote...
| > "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote...
| > |
| > | I believe we should move this discussion into separate thread.
| > | FOREACH is under review now and range_ex is not even requested yet.
| > | If we want it to be reviewed the first step in this direction could
| > | be to request one.
| > Then I request a review :-)
| > Eric, please just respond privately or in a new thread.
| > -Thorsten
| I don't believe it's ready for that. You may feel you know the answers
| to those design questions, but I'm less confident, and I would like more
| Besides, Dave A. has been working in this space, and if a unified
| approach to range algorithms can be found, that would be preferable. If
| no such unified approach can be found, I want to know that it has at
| least been explored.
| If you would like to drive the development of range_ex, be my guest.
Sorry, no time.
I will be proposing a range based version of <algorithm> in an autumn paper,
but I don't think the interface will change significantly even with a grand
model of everything.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk