From: Jeff Flinn (TriumphSprint2000_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-02 08:13:16
"Iain K. Hanson" <ikh_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:25:44PM -0400, Joe Gottman wrote:
>> "Iain K. Hanson" <ikh_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> > This will be the first time we accept a macro into boost ( aside from
>> > boost PP)
>> > and I just think this sends the wrong message.
>> Actually, this isn't true. we accepted BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT into boost
>> quite a while ago. Note that the standards committee is seriously
>> considering adding static assertions to the core (see
> Yes, but BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT is a library writers tool, not really for end
Please don't make me take it out of my applications. :-) Seriously, from my
experience, as a non-library-writer, I use it in several places to ensure I
don't do something stupid in the future.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk