From: Iain K. Hanson (ikh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-01 18:51:33
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:25:44PM -0400, Joe Gottman wrote:
> "Iain K. Hanson" <ikh_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > This will be the first time we accept a macro into boost ( aside from
> > boost PP)
> > and I just think this sends the wrong message.
> Actually, this isn't true. we accepted BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT into boost
> quite a while ago. Note that the standards committee is seriously
> considering adding static assertions to the core (see
Yes, but BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT is a library writers tool, not really for end users.
And the same applies to Concept checking and boost test.
I'm familar with the DBC proposal and I hope it makes it into the standard, But
I'm not sure how much influence it has had on the proposal or its acceptance.
However, I would support a macro in boost if its primary purpose was to support
something needed in the standard. And you have no idea how hard it is for me
to write that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk