From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-02 19:52:39
What is the rationale behind this name? It seems unintuitive to me,
and what's more, unneccessary. Shouldn't
range_iterator<T const>::type just be range_const_iterator<T>::type?
If not, why not?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk