Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-02 19:52:39

Next message: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] Re: [Range] issues"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] Re: [Range] issues"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] Re: range_result_iterator"
Reply: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] Re: range_result_iterator"

What is the rationale behind this name? It seems unintuitive to me,
and what's more, unneccessary. Shouldn't
range_iterator<T const>::type just be range_const_iterator<T>::type?

If not, why not?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] Re: [Range] issues"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] Re: [Range] issues"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] Re: range_result_iterator"
Reply: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] Re: range_result_iterator"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk